The Adaptive Control Decision Support System – Case Study

VICTORY BOULEVARD



Victory Boulevard is a major thoroughfare on Staten Island, measuring approximately 8.0 miles from the west to the upper east shore.The traffic flow is characterized by east-west bound heavy commuting traffic in addition to the significant traffic entering and exiting the College campus.
         

The Victory Boulevard deployment features sparse detectorization and an signal optimization operation capable of dynamically adjusting cycle, offset, and splits in real-time to prevailing traffic conditions.


The ACDSS deployment site covers a 0.5 mile stretch of Victory Boulevard from North Gannon Ave to Morani St (Figure 1), including 4 signalized intersections. The College Entrance/Victory Boulevard intersection (circle #3 in the map) is the critical intersection, servicing traffic into and out of the College of Staten Island. The traffic pattern at this site is characterized by daily commuter traffic in addition to the traffic entering into and exiting the College campus. The latter is heavily influenced by class schedules and varies daily, making this a good candidate site for adaptive control. At the Christopher Lane/Victory Boulevard intersection (circle #2), the east-west arterial traffic is joined by the off-ramp traffic from a nearby freeway. Prior to activating adaptive signal control, the site had been running on time-of-day fixed timing plans.


Figure 1: Victory Boulevard Deployment(4 Intersections).
Figure 1: Victory Boulevard Deployment (4 Intersections).

This figure shows a 4-intersection deployment at Victory Boulevard.  The College Entrance/Victory Boulevard intersection (circle # 3) is the critical intersection, with traffic flow varies daily due to class schedules.  The Christopher Lane intersection (circle #2) is where the arterial joins the freeway.       

   

DETECTION


5 RTMS microwave sensors are strategically deployed to provide mid-block flow and occupancy data for a total of 19 detection zones; the data is aggregated at 30 second intervals. Non-critical turning movements are interpolated by an advanced real-time data estimation algorithm. The whole site, if fully instrumented with detectors would require 67 detection zones. Thus this minimal/sparse detectorization provides the necessary data inputs to the system while effectively minimizing the ongoing operation and maintenance costs for detection equipment. Figure 2 shows the detection layout at this site.

Figure 2: Sparse Detectorization Layout.
Figure 2: Sparse Detectorization Layout.

This figure shows the schematic of 5 RTMS detection units deployed at mid-block locations. These units are marked as D4 to D8. The arrows represent all turning movements relevant to the adaptive control. At locations where there are no detection units, turning movement volumes are dynamically estimated based on the data from other detection units.

THE SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION

Adaptive signal plans are implemented by the Peek ASTC-CBD 3000 controllers at the intersections. ACDSS communicates with the field controllers through TransSuite TCS/Web Service Interface. The latter talks to the controllers through the standard NTCIP. No proprietary MIBs are required. Data objects of standard NTCIP MIB are used to dynamically change the cycle, offset and splits based on prevailing traffic conditions. Figure 4 (see over) shows the splits’ variations in response to the real-time data.


Figure 3: Percentage Improvements of Arterial MOEs in Victory Boulevard Deployment.
Figure 3: Percentage Improvements of Arterial MOEs.

BENEFITS

ACDSS has demonstrated significant improvements in arterial performance. These include 8% fuel consumption saving, 42% reduction in average stops, 30% reduction in average delay, 20% improvement in speeds and 7% improvement of throughput.
See Figure 3.



Figure 3: EB, WB, WB Left Turn and NB trafic volume and occupancy data.Figure 3: EB, WB, WB Left Turn and NB trafic volume and occupancy data.
Figure 4: Real Time Detection Data and Resulted Split Variations at the Critical Intersection.

The upper panel shows the EB, WB, WB left turn, and NB traffic volume and occupancy data. The lower panel shows the resulted splits during typical PM peak hours. The WB left turn traffic entering the College campus is heavily influenced by the class schedule and varies daily. During peak hours, the spill-backs from the WB left turn traffic significantly impact the adjacent lanes further exacerbating the EB and WB traffic conditions. By changing signal timing in real-time, ACDSS significantly improves the traffic at the critical intersection while resulting in reduced of number of stops, improved travel speeds and throughput of the overall arterial system..